NASA是否认为有宇航员在太空中表现不佳?Has NASA ever deemed an astronaut’s performance on a space mission unsatisfactory?

【翻译自quora,答主为Clayton C. Anderson,前美国宇航员,在STS-117上发射后,他于2007年6月10日取代Sunita Williams,成为ISS Expedition 15机组成员。】

回答正文:

Why yes they have… and it was me/mine!

他们当然有过了…..那就是我!

As a member of the 15th expedition to the International Space Station, I apparently became classified as a bit of a “problem child.” It had nothing to do with my ability to do all jobs in space correctly, quickly, and professionally. I would learn it was my attitude that was at issue. Many folks on the Mission Control Center team felt that while I was doing everything asked of me, I was still not performing as they would have liked. In other words, they were not happy with my willingness to call them out at times, pointing out instances that I thought were rife with inefficiencies. Their expectation was that I do everything they say –without question– and keep my big mouth shut!

作为第15届国际空间站探险队的成员,我显然被归类为“问题儿童”。这个归类与我有正确,快速,专业地完成太空中所有工作的能力无关。我会发现问题在于我的态度。任务控制中心团队中的许多人认为,当我做去做一些我应该做的事时,我仍然没有表现出他们想要的表现。换句话说,他们对我不时提出要求不满意,并指出我认为效率低下的例子很多。他们的期望是,我要毫不犹豫地做到他们所说的一切,并且最好闭嘴!

My new book, The Ordinary Spaceman: From Boyhood Dreams to Astronaut, (University of Nebraska Press) provides several relevant examples in Chapter 14. Entitled “Crime and Punishment,” a short, unedited excerpt from my original manuscript is provided here:

我的新书《普通的太空人:从少年时代的梦想到宇航员》(内布拉斯加大学出版社)在第14章中提供了几个例子。标题为“犯罪与惩罚”,一个简短,未经修改的摘录自我的原始手稿将在下面展示

The total number of weightless turds I launched from ISS escapes me, but no doubt it was substantial. Safely back on the ground after a sometimes combative five months, I was sentenced to what I would call the astronaut version of “community service,” otherwise known as the astronaut penalty box.

我从国际空间站发射的失重粪便的总数使我逃脱了,但毫无疑问,这是相当可观的。经过五个月的战斗之后,我安全地回到了地面,但我被惩罚要做宇航员版的“社区服务”,也就是所谓的宇航员处罚箱。


The words used by the Astronaut Evaluation Board (AEB) to describe my 152 days of service onboard the ISS were, in part: “… although Clayton is thoughtful with his peers, he needs to improve his communication skills and attitude towards other teams with which he interfaces,” and that “he tended to be a bit too casual with MCC, and sometimes too frank, and he could have been more patient during stressful times.” They went on to say that “Clay will need to rebuild his relationship with MCC if he is to fly again.” The recommendation for my flight status, as developed by my office peers, was listed as “conditionally eligible.”

宇航员评估委员会(AEB)用来形容我在ISS服役152天的用语部分是:“……尽管克莱顿与同龄人一样周到,但他需要提高自己的沟通技巧和对其他团队的态度 他的界面,”他说,“他对MCC有点太随意,有时也太直白了,在面临压力时他本可以更耐心一些。”他们接着说,“Clay需要重新与MCC打好关系,对我飞行状态的建议,我的同行们说这是“有条件的”。


It’s tough to admit, but for some of this, they were right. While my intentions were always aimed at making things better for those who would follow me into space, I had not heeded their advice, and I let the frustration build to a point where it affected my work and interactions with the ground. Even though my family and I legitimately experienced those “dark days,” I could have handled myself better. I did not follow the unspoken rule that, no matter what, the ground is always right and they should be treated with “kid gloves.”

我认为他们很多地方说错了,但其中一些他们又是对的。 尽管我的意图始终是为那些会跟随我进入太空的人们提供更好的服务,但我没有听从他们的建议,我让挫败感发展到了影响我的工作和与地面互动的地步。 即使我和我的家人经历了那些“黑暗的日子”,但我知道我本可以处理得更好的。 我没有遵循潜规则,即无论如何,地面永远是正确的,应该给他们戴“儿童手套”。


Yet I wasn’t totally at fault. The situation on ISS where we all did work behind the same panel in the same week was, in my opinion, ridiculous. As a crew support astronaut for the Expedition 4 crew, I knew, and participated in, the weekly planning meetings where these exact types of situations were/are discussed. I was, on numerous occasions, the voice behind the “elephant in the room” when the technical team failed, even then, to grasp the concept of “proper planning prevents poor performance.” To direct a crew to waste that amount of identical (and expensive) crew time on orbit was the highest form of Government waste. It was inexcusable.
But I could have handled it differently; as I would quickly find out.

我并不是完全错了。 我认为,在国际上空间站上,我们在同一个面板上一起工作一个星期的情况非常可笑。 作为Expedition 4机组的宇航员支援宇航员,我知道,并参加了每周计划会议,讨论了这些类型事情的情况。 在很多情况下,当技术团队失败时,我不会避而不谈而会毫不犹豫地指出,弄清楚“防止性能下降的合适计划”究竟是什么。工作人员一次又一次地浪费昂贵的的机组人员在轨时间是政府浪费的最高形式。 这是不可原谅的。但是 我很快就会发现我本可以以不同的方式处理它。


The “community service” recommended by the AEB; “that Clay would benefit from leadership/followership and teamwork training,” that “he be put in a leadership role, perhaps as a branch chief, to satisfy this development in part,” and that “he consult with his Human Resources representative for additional development classes,” was taken to heart.
Still, it was tough getting dressed down like that.

AEB推荐的“社区服务”时说; “Clay将从领导/跟随和团队合作培训中受益,”“让他担任领导职务,也许作为分公司负责人,以部分满足这一发展要求,”并且“他向人力资源代表咨询其他发展课程”。
尽管如此,要像这样穿衣服还是很困难的。

I would not be taken off of probationary status until I received a call from astronaut management in “the corner office,” telling me I had been assigned to the crew of STS-131 and Discovery.

直到我从“角落办公室”的宇航员管理部门接到电话,告诉我我已被分配给STS-131和Discovery的机组人员,我才能从试用期解脱出来。

Keep lookin’ up! I always did.

看看吧,我总是这样做!

评论:@Paul King

It’s an interesting dilemma. Inefficiency and “bone-headed processes” grate on me and several of my friends & colleagues, however I have gotten myself in trouble by pointing them out too candidly. I always appreciate it when others do that (I think!), but it doesn’t go over well with everyone, particularly people who are insecure or those who are highly process or “role” oriented.

Any tips for making inefficient organizations better without ruffling too many feathers?

这是一个有趣的难题。 低效率和“骨头处理”使我以及我的一些朋友和同事感到不快,但是我过分坦率地指出了他们的错误,这让我遇到了很大麻烦。 当别人坦率指出我的错误时,我总是很感激(我认为!),但是对于别的人来说,尤其是那些不安全的人或高度重视流程或“角色”的人,这样做并不能很好解决。

有什么技巧可以使效率低下的组织变得更好而又招人反感呢?

答主回答:

Best method is to convince group that it’s THEIR idea, not yours.  Not always an easy thing to do, but very effective when successful.

最好的方法是说服小组,他们这是做是因为他们想这样做,而不是您想这样做。 这并非总是一件容易的事,但成功时非常有效。

【以下部分翻译自wiki】

国际空间站的生活International Space Station

Anderson was a member of the Expedition 15 crew and spent 152 days on board the International Space Station. He launched to the station aboard Shuttle Atlantis as Mission Specialist 5 for the STS-117 mission on June 8, 2007,[6] and remained on board as a member of the Expedition 16 crew before returning to earth aboard Discovery on mission STS-120 on November 7, 2007. On return his official title was Mission Specialist 5.[7] Two of the photos that he took during his July and August 2007 spacewalks were listed on Popular Science’s photo gallery of the best astronaut selfies.[8]

安德森(Anderson)是远征号15号的成员,在国际空间站上呆了152天。他于2007年6月8日乘坐航天飞机Shuttle Atlantis作为STS-117任务5的专家5升空,并继续以远征16号机组人员的身份留在机上,然后乘坐发现号STS-120返回地球。 2007年11月7日。他的正式头衔是任务专员5。[7]他在2007年7月和2007年8月的太空行走中拍摄的两张照片被列在科普图片库里的最佳宇航员自拍照中。[8]

Anderson continued a tradition aboard the International Space Station, started by Michael Lopez-Alegria, of conducting daily “trivia” contests with mission control team members on the ground.[9] During Alegria’s seven-month stay on the station he would routinely call down movie quotes and challenge the team members to determine the movie the quote was from. Towards the end of his mission he changed to music trivia playing a portion of a song and challenging the team to complete the line.

安德森继续由迈克尔·洛佩兹·阿莱格里亚(Michael Lopez-Alegria)开创的国际空间站上的传统,每天与地面任务控制小组成员进行“琐事”竞赛。[9]在阿莱格里亚(Alegria)在车站七个月的逗留期间,他会例行引用某部电影里的一句台词,并向队员发出挑战,看谁能知道这句台词来自哪部电影。在他的任务接近尾声时,他改成了音乐琐事,演奏了一部分歌曲,并向团队提出挑战,看谁能继续弹奏完。

Anderson has taken this tradition and put his own personal twist on it, using the “Book of Answers: The New York Public Library Telephone Reference Service’s Most Unusual and Entertaining Questions”. Anderson often played song clips for the ground control team, or specific individuals, most notably when he played the song “(Everything I Do) I Do It for You” by Bryan Adams for his wife on her birthday.

安德森采用了这一传统,并使用了“答案之书:纽约公共图书馆电话参考服务的最不寻常和最有趣的问题”,并在此基础上提出了自己的个人看法。安德森(Anderson)经常为地面控制团队或特定个人播放歌曲剪辑,最著名的是他在生日那天为布莱恩·亚当斯(Bryan Adams)的妻子播放歌曲“(我所做的一切)我为你而做”。

【另,在Clay的个人主页上发现一段魔性的视频,改编自江南Style的NASA johnson style】

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=87&v=2Sar5WT76kE

Leave a Reply